C1 · Lessons
Available lessons: 80
This level is still being developed.
- Recognise a position that is not stated directly
- Express inference without turning it into a fact
- Unpack a dense sentence without changing its scope
- Synthesise competing views for a new audience
- Interpret figures without overstating the evidence
- Weigh objections without inventing a disagreement
- Report claims without adopting them as established facts
- Make a recommendation that can be checked and revised
- Keep conditions and exceptions intact
- Reason about unreal past alternatives
- Separate process, state and responsibility
- Resolve complex references without guessing
- Unpack dense wording without changing meaning
- Distinguish contrast, concession and time
- Be polite without overpromising
- Combine perspectives without inventing consensus
- Expand long attributes without changing reference
- Separate obligation, feasibility and completion
- Track references to statements and topics
- Read the exact scope of focus and negation
- Respond with care without unsupported promises
- Separate observations, interpretations and assigned tasks
- Negotiate alternatives and preserve their constraints
- Do not present preferences as a decision
- Answer the actual argument
- Keep findings within their evidence
- Preserve what a quotation actually claims
- Interpret a narrator without inventing certainty
- Distinguish inference from obligation
- Separate claims, reports and intentions
- Read particles through their conversation
- Recognise indirect criticism without mind-reading
- Distinguish criteria in cultural reviews
- Describe digital availability precisely
- Separate ownership, access and public purpose
- Describe environmental choices without shortcuts
- Compare the same period and separate unresolved conditions
- Negotiate a hotel alternative without weakening a requirement
- Clarify a delivery discrepancy without inventing blame
- Mediate a shared purchase with different expectations
- Reconstruct a timeline through a flashback
- Separate a starting point, a duration and a deadline
- Distinguish a recurring condition from a single event
- Read future completion and conjecture in context
- Distinguish an option, consideration and doubt
- Separate an announced resource from actual availability
- Distinguish acknowledgement, objection and a position statement
- Interpret figurative expressions without exaggerating the result
- Separate a readable text from an understood instruction
- Keep a price adjective attached to what it describes
- Identify whether wording is ambiguous or information is missing
- Read one verb through its objects and grammatical frame
- Choose an opening that connects to the previous point
- Place a long content clause where readers can follow it
- Describe an impression without turning it into a fact
- Express a relationship without pretending it is a guarantee
- Report a repair pilot without promising too much
- Correct a timetable claim using the later decision
- Ask a precise hotel question from two incomplete sources
- Present a packaging trial without a false causal conclusion
- Clarify the actual objection
- Clarify an offer without assuming a promise
- Interrupt constructively and keep the thread
- Turn a disagreement into a precise next step
- Build an argument that matches its evidence
- Write a precise complaint without inventing facts
- Improve a proposal by answering its strongest objection
- Revise meaning, organisation and register in separate passes
- Explain a specialist concept without changing the claim
- Preserve denominators and select what the recipient needs
- Combine updated notices without promising an unconfirmed route
- Hand over observations, actions and unresolved status
- Interpret ja, doch and eben within the conversation
- Paraphrase idioms without extending their scope
- Be tactful without blurring a refusal or inventing a promise
- Express the same facts in three different registers
- Recognise a position and test it fairly
- Track a position as it is clarified in discussion
- Develop a recommendation with a serious counterargument
- Organise dependent actions for another person