B2 · Lessons

Available lessons: 80

1. Separate a claim, its reason and its evidence
2. Concede a difficulty without abandoning the argument
3. Connect and weigh genuinely different considerations
4. Build a coherent recommendation with explicit conditions
5. Track references in a complex account
6. Unpack nominalizations without losing the relationship
7. Compare findings without overstating their reach
8. Turn a cautious comparison into a practical learning trial
9. Compare work models using relevant criteria
10. Express what can and must be done precisely
11. Distinguish obligation, permission and an exception
12. Negotiate an agreement with visible responsibilities
13. Be polite without making the request vague
14. Support a professional claim with a relevant example
15. Clarify an ambiguous request before acting
16. Give feedback on an observable problem and a next step
17. Attribute a claim without adopting it as your own
18. Keep the speaker, time and verbal form consistent
19. Check a headline against the underlying report
20. Synthesise reports without erasing a disagreement
21. Unpack a dense description without changing its meaning
22. Separate a goal from the method and the result
23. Explain what a service does and under which conditions
24. Recommend a digital option for a specific group
25. Decode precise descriptions of a living space
26. Compare living options using explicit priorities
27. Read a shared-space notice with its exceptions
28. Formulate a workable neighbourhood compromise
29. Connect a reason to its consequence clearly
30. Acknowledge a mobility objection without losing the argument
31. Plan a connection under explicit conditions
32. Develop a balanced proposal for public space
33. Build a complaint that a reader can act on
34. Distinguish an obligation from a possibility in service wording
35. Read what a service reply actually commits to
36. Write a constructive reply with clear next steps
37. Express linked changes with je and desto
38. Compare total use with a per-person value
39. Check the scope of an environmental claim
40. Propose an improvement with a meaningful evaluation
41. Describe how someone feels without inventing a cause
42. Clarify an information gap with indirect questions
43. Relay a support notice without changing its scope
44. Summarise feedback without turning it into proof
45. Separate expectations from an actual agreement
46. Raise a problem without generalizing about a person
47. Discuss a social pattern without stereotyping individuals
48. Frame an impression as an impression and invite correction
49. Write a review that separates description and judgement
50. Track whose work, collection or interpretation is meant
51. Choose an event using actual needs and stated limitations
52. Interpret a literary excerpt without confusing voice and fact
53. Reconstruct the order behind a travel story
54. Discuss a past alternative without changing the facts
55. Repair an intercultural misunderstanding without stereotyping
56. Pass on a changing travel plan for two audiences
57. Describe a trend without flattening its fluctuations
58. Explain what a survey sample can and cannot show
59. Explain a measurement so that a comparison is fair
60. Translate technical wording into a clear public explanation
61. Find the deadline and the actual status in a public notice
62. Apply an exception only to the requirement it changes
63. Pass on a provisional agreement with its conditions intact
64. Explain a shared choice using requirements and preferences
65. Give each paragraph a clear argumentative job
66. Make a formal request polite without making it vague
67. Make references and paragraph links unambiguous
68. Revise a draft in two passes: meaning, then language
69. Give listeners a route through a short presentation
70. Explain a comparison according to the audience’s criteria
71. Answer a challenging question without losing the distinction
72. Negotiate a feasible next step and record its status
73. Combine two sources without blending their status
74. Adapt one factual core for two different audiences
75. Represent contrasting positions without turning them into caricatures
76. Negotiate around needs rather than fixed slogans
77. Turn a detailed brief into a prioritised action plan
78. Recommend an offer while naming the unresolved condition
79. Turn a confirmation into a clear participant message
80. Evaluate a completed project without claiming more than the evidence