Clarify missing information without filling gaps by guesswork
Dazu liegen mir noch keine Informationen vor; ich frage nach.
Separate explicit facts, plausible assumptions and unknown details, then formulate a targeted follow-up.
A trustworthy relay says both what the source gives and what it leaves open. Dazu liegen mir keine Informationen vor names a gap without turning it into a negative fact. Nicht angegeben does not mean nicht erlaubt or nicht vorhanden. Use Könnten Sie bestätigen, ob …? for a yes/no uncertainty and Wie …? or Welche …? for an open detail. If you misunderstood earlier, correct the specific point and tell the recipient which action changes. Preserve all the other verified facts. A useful follow-up asks for the missing condition instead of demanding that the source repeat everything.
Dazu liegen mir noch keine Informationen vor; ich frage nach.
I do not yet have information about that; I will ask.
Im Hinweis wird nur der Beginn genannt, nicht das Ende.
The notice gives only the start, not the end.
Könnten Sie bestätigen, ob der Zugang ohne Stufen möglich ist?
Could you confirm whether access without steps is possible?
Meine frühere Nachricht war in einem Punkt ungenau.
My earlier message was inaccurate on one point.
Der Termin bleibt gleich, aber der Treffpunkt wurde geändert.
The appointment time remains the same, but the meeting point has changed.
Bitte nutze deshalb die neue Adresse in der Bestätigung.
Please therefore use the new address in the confirmation.
A trustworthy relay says both what the source gives and what it leaves open. Dazu liegen mir keine Informationen vor names a gap without turning it into a negative fact. Nicht angegeben does not mean nicht erlaubt or nicht vorhanden. Use Könnten Sie bestätigen, ob …? for a yes/no uncertainty and Wie …? or Welche …? for an open detail. If you misunderstood earlier, correct the specific point and tell the recipient which action changes. Preserve all the other verified facts. A useful follow-up asks for the missing condition instead of demanding that the source repeat everything.
Separate explicit facts, plausible assumptions and unknown details, then formulate a targeted follow-up.
If the notice says nothing about step-free access, do not say it is impossible. Ask whether and how access is available.
Explicit fact → marked gap → targeted question → corrected update. Missing information is not proof of absence; a correction changes only the affected claim.
Write two short messages totalling 120–140 words: first ask an organizer about one missing condition, then send a corrected update after a fictional reply.